Klaus-Heiner Lehne
This page was last edited on at
Klaus-Heiner Lehne is a German lawyer who was a Member of the European Parliament (MEP) from 1994-2014.
On 23 January 2014, Lehne was appointed Auditor to the European Court of Auditors by the European Parliament.1
Relationship with the Tobacco Industry
Employer Law Firm Had Tobacco Client
Lehne was a partner in the Düsseldorf law firm Taylor Wessing, when the firm listed Japan Tobacco International (JTI) as its .2
In July 2013, when the EU Tobacco Products Directive (TPD) was under review, fellow MEP Michèle Rivasi wrote an open letter to Lehne, asking him to clarify his potential conflict of interest arising from his position with Taylor Gessing, and its client JTI.3
Lehne rejected the notion of a conflict of interest, but stopped short of denying involvement with tobacco companies in his capacity as partner of Taylor Wessing. Lehne claimed it was his duty to “meet with all stakeholders concerned by a proposed legislative act….in order to make informed and balance decisions”.
For Lehne’s full response to Michèle Rivasi, click .
Regular Meetings with Philip Morris During Tobacco Products Directive Revision
Leaked internal documents from Philip Morris International (PMI) reveal that the tobacco company had annual meetings with the MEP from February 2008 (see Image 1), shortly after the European Commission was tasked to review the Tobacco Products Directive.4
Opposed Tobacco Control Measures in the EU
‘High Priority’ Lobby Target
The leaked PMI documents reveal that the company considered Lehne a ‘high priority” lobby target during the TPD review.5
At the time, Lehne chaired the Committee of Legal Affairs (JURI), one of three Parliamentary committees at the heart of PMI’s lobbying strategy.67
PMI assessed Lehne’s (alleged) position on tobacco issues and documented its findings in a colour-coded spreadsheet (see Image 2).8
The colour green indicates a pro-tobacco position. The spreadsheet documents that PMI considered Lehne’s views favourable on Plain (or generic) packaging (GP), Expanded Health Warnings (EHW), and Point of Sales Display Ban (POSDB), but appears unclear on Lehne’s position in relation to the ingredients ban (IB), New Generation Products (NGPs), and snus.
Issued Negative JURI Opinion on TPD
In addition to being JURI Chair, Lehne was also appointed rapporteur for the JURI opinion on the TPD. On 29 April 2013, he published JURI’s draft opinion, concluding that the TPD proposal “raised significant legal concerns”, in particular the legal base, the right to property, and the principle of proportionality.9
JURI’s negative opinion was just as PMI had intended, “opposing extreme measures”, instead proposing measures that were significantly watered down: including reducing the health warnings to cover only 50% of the packs (as opposed to the 75% proposed by the Commission) and to delete the option for individual member states to introduce plain packaging.
Lehne briefly spoke during the Parliamentary debate on the TPD in October 2013, proceeding the plenary vote, and labelled the proposed revision of the TPD “Ein juristischer Hochseilakt” (a legal tightrope), warning that the lack of legal basis would put the TPD at risk of being defeated in the European Court of Justice.10
TobaccoTactics Resources
- Japan Tobacco International
- Philip Morris International
- EU Tobacco Products Directive Revision
- PMI’s Lobbying Campaign to Undermine the TPD
- TPD: Legal Challenges
Relevant Link
European Parliament MEP biography (all EU languagues)
TCRG Research
- The revision of the 2014 European tobacco products directive: an analysis of the tobacco industry’s attempts to ‘break the health silo’, S. Peeters, H. Costa, D. Stuckler, M. McKee, A.B. Gilmore, 2016, Tobacco Control; 25:108-117
- Quantifying the influence of tobacco industry on EU governance: automated content analysis of the EU Tobacco Products Directive, H. Costa, A.B. Gilmore, S. Peeters, M. McKee, D. Stuckler, 2014, Tobacco Control; 23:473-478