Kenya- BAT's Tactics to Undermine the Tobacco Control Regulations
Kenya’s efforts to introduce tobacco control legislation that regulates the marketing and sale of tobacco products has been resisted by British American Tobacco (BAT) and other tobacco companies, which see Kenya and other African countries as a frontier area for profit growth. Consequently legislation in the country has repeatedly been thwarted by the tobacco industry.
- 1 Tobacco Control Legislation in Kenya
- 2 Tobacco Industry Opposing Regulations
- 3 Industry Tactics to Interfere with the Regulations
- 4 TobaccoTactics Resources
- 5 Additional Resources
- 6 Notes
Tobacco Control Legislation in Kenya
Kenya’s Tobacco Control Act 2007 took over 13 years to be passed, largely due to what has been labelled by the Kenya Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation as “intimidation” and “interference” from the tobacco industry. The Act tried to introduce regulations that already exist in much of the Western world, such as required text warnings on cigarette packets, designated smoking zones in public places and the prohibition of tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship. However, since its creation in 2007, implementation has been difficult. Since 2014, Kenyan policymakers have been trying to pass new regulations which would strengthen the evidence-based framework established by the existing Tobacco Control Act. As of March 2019, the Tobacco Control Regulations 2014 were stalled in the Supreme Court, still awaiting enactment.
- For further details of BAT’s legal challenges see Kenya- Country Profile and Kenya- Timeline from the Kenyan parliament before being passed into law and implemented.
Tobacco Industry Opposing Regulations
The tobacco industry’s main quarrels with the new regulations remain:
- the imposition of a financial contribution of 2% of the value of manufactured and imported tobacco products. This would go towards mitigating the health and socio-economic consequences caused by the products the industry sells;
- the requirement of standard graphic health warnings as many people cannot read text warnings;
- the restriction of the tobacco industry’s involvement in the policymaking process as mandated by the FCTC
Industry Tactics to Interfere with the Regulations
Some of the ways the tobacco industry has tried to hinder regulation are outlined below:
On 14 April 2015, BAT Kenya filed a petition at the High Court insisting the Tobacco Control Regulations 2014 were “unconstitutional” and requesting that the regulations be dismissed entirely.  When the High Court ruled against BAT, the tobacco company took the case to appeal in 2016, and then to the Supreme Court in 2017. As of August 2019, the Supreme Court had not given its final decision, and so the regulations have not as yet been implemented, four years after they were passed into law.
- For more information on BAT court cases against the Kenyan government, see our profile page on Kenya- Country Profile
- For more information on how the industry has used the legal strategy to influence the policy process in other parts of the world, see Legal Strategy
Lobbying By Government Officials
On 3 February 2015, the Kenyan Ministry of Health received a letter from the President’s Office requesting a meeting to “come up with a common understanding” on the new regulations and to discuss concerns listed in a briefing passed on from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Trade. This document proposed that the regulations be withdrawn completely or redeveloped in collaboration with stakeholders, of which tobacco companies are highly prominent.
Engaging with Policymakers
Both BAT and Mastermind Tobacco Kenya (MTK) have, on multiple occasions, directly engaged parliamentary committees using what have been described by senior civil servants at the Ministry of Health as “manipulative tactics,” declaring their objections to the regulations and requesting meetings in person to discuss alterations. As a signatory to the FCTC, there is meant to be limited, supervised interaction between the industry and government officials.
Working Through Third parties
In January 2015, the Kenya Ministry of Health received a letter from an individual describing herself only as “a citizen of the Republic of Kenya” requesting all available information and correspondence pertaining to the regulations be handed over. Her contact information was the same as BAT Kenya’s headquarters although she failed to disclose this conflict of interest. That same month, January 2015, the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee in Kenya held a meeting to discuss the 2014 draft regulations. The meeting was attended by two staff members of BAT as well as representatives of the Kenya Association of Manufacturers (KAM), of which BAT is a member. At the meeting, KAM gave a presentation offering the exact same arguments that tobacco companies have used in their correspondence opposing the regulations. The TBT Committee has been utilised by the industry as a key outlet for influencing policy. In March 2012, the Ministry of Trade collaborated directly with the tobacco industry to host a workshop for all stakeholders at a resort spa meant to “build the technical competence…on the trade issues of concern”.
After the Nairobi City Council Tobacco Bill 2018 was tabled, statements made by some Kenyan business organisations mirrored many of those used by BAT, in Kenya and elsewhere. In February 2019, BAT Managing Director Beverley Spencer-Obatoyinbo, described the bill as a case of “overregulation”, saying that point of sale restrictions were “extreme” and would have “unintended consequences” for small businesses, “like harassment and arrests”. The following month, after a government run engagement event, the CEO of the Retail Association of Kenya (RETRAK) referred to the targeting of small businesses and “unintended consequences”, adding that the proposed bill was more about “addressing a shortfall in tax collection” than public health. The acting CEO of the Nairobi branch of the Kenya National Chamber of Commerce stated that the bill had “the potential to increase illicit trade and sale of substandard goods, therefore posing a huge problem for the industry and the country at large.” These arguments are all commonly used by the tobacco industry to undermine tobacco control measures, but are not supported by scientific evidence (follow the links for more information):
- that they will impact unfairly on small businesses
- that they are focussed more on increasing revenue than on public health
- that they will lead to an increase in tax evasion and illicit trade
(BAT used similar arguments around illicit trade and tax evasion in response to the announcement of government plans to increase tobacco taxes in 2019. Although in this case the company said that the proposals threatened their own business. See Kenya- Country Profile)
The Nairobi County Tobacco Control Bill was passed on its 3rd reading in June 2019.
See Kenya- Country Profile for more information. TobaccoTactics resources point to further evidence on how the tobacco industry use third parties to help get their message out and lobby policy makers by, for example, building alliances with business associations.
For more information on the tobacco industry and Africa, see:
- Kenya- Country Profile
- Kenya- Timeline: Industry Interference with the Tobacco Control Regulations 2014
- Kenya- BAT's Tactics to Influence Track and Trace Tender
This piece was originally written by the TCRG for The Guardian' Sustainable Business website and was published on 2 March 2015. This page was updated in September 2019 in the light of Kenyan court activity since 2015, and the new Tobacco Control bill introduced in Nairobi in 2018, which passed into law in 2019.
- RR. Jackson, Tobacco industry accused of ‘intimidation and interference’ in Kenya, The Guardian, 2 March 2015, accessed September 2019
- Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation, International Institute for Legislative Affairs, Centre for Tobacco Control in Africa, Tobacco industry interference in Kenya: Exposing the tactics, January 2013, accessed September 2019
- Uganda National Tobacco Control Association, Shadow report on the status of the implementation of the World Health Organisation Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO-FCTC) Articles 8 & 13 in Uganda – 2012, May 2013
- Center for Tobacco Control in Africa, Tobacco Industry Monitoring Regional Report for Africa, August 2013, accessed September 2019
- Cabinet Secretary for Health Kenya, The Tobacco Control Act 2007, The Tobacco Control Regulations, 2014
- P. Lopokoiyit, Finance Director BAT Kenya, Letter to Hon. Phyllis Kandie, Kenya Tobacco Control Regulation 2014 – Potential impact on East Africa Community (EAC) Principles and Obligations, 18 December 2014
- P.Patel, J.Collin, AB. Gilmore, “The law was actually drafted by us but the Government is to be congratulated on its wise actions": British American Tobacco and public policy in Kenya, Tobacco Control, February 2007, accessed September 2019
- British American Tobacco Kenya, Petition no. 143 in the matter of the Tobacco Control Regulations 2014 between British American Tobacco Kenya Ltd and the Cabinet Secretary for the Ministry of Health, 14 April 2015, accessed September 2019
- C. Maina, BAT challenges new cigarette regulations on packaging from Ministry of Health, The Star, 16 April 2015, accessed September 2019
- Chief of Staff and Head of Public Service, Letter to Cabinet Secretary of the Ministry of Health, New Tobacco Regulations, 3 February 2015
- Director of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Kenya Tobacco Control Regulations 2014 – potential impacts on East African Community (EAC) principles and obligations, 27 January 2015
- Mastermind Tobacco (K) Limited, Letter to Cabinet Secretary of the Ministry of Health, Request for a meeting with Parliamentary committees on Delegated Legislation, Finance and Health, 22 January 2015
- LRW. Mwago, Director for Internal Trade, Letter to the Ministry of Health, RE: Request for a meeting with Parliamentary committees on Delegated Legislation, Finance and Health, 20 January 2015
- World Health Organization, Guidelines for implementation of Article 5.3 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control , accessed September 2019
- C. Anyika, Letter to Cabinet Secretary of the Ministry of Health, Request for information held by the state pertaining to the Tobacco Control Regulations 2014, 27 January 2015
- Kenya Bureau of Standards, Meeting Minutes, 20 January 2015
- C. Mwaniki, Egypt crisis hits Kenya as exports fall by Sh2 billion, 17 October 2013, accessed September 2019
- Kenya Association of Manufacturers, Press release: Sub-standard goods, accessed April 2015
- Kenya Association of Manufacturers, Kenya Tobacco Control Regulations 2014
- BL. Kaleve, Chairman, National TBT Consultative Committee, Invitation to attend TBT workshop in Naivasha on 13th -14th March 2012, 2 March 2012
- Nairobi Assembly: Bills, Nairobi Assembly website, accessed September 2019
- P. Alushula, BAT says City tobacco bill ‘extreme’ The Daily Nation, 17 February 2019, accessed September 2019
- J. Mueni, Cigarette makers, retailers slam Nairobi County Tobacco Bill 2018 as ‘too repressive’ Capital Business, 4 March 2019, accessed March 2019
- V. Amadala, Business bodies slam Nairobi’s Tobacco Bill as too oppressive The Star, 4 March 2019, accessed September 2019
- Action on Smoking and Health (ASH), World Bank cites UK as example of how tobacco taxes can be used to increase government revenues and improve public health ASH press release 1 February 2019, accessed September 2019
- A. Wako, Pain for revellers as Rotich hits alcohol, cigarettes with higher taxes, The Nation: Nairobi News, 13 June 2019, accessed September 2019
- M. Omusulu, BAT faults treasury’s tax measures, Standard Digital”, 20 July 2019. Accessed August 2019