US-ASEAN Business Council
This page was last edited on at
-
US-ASEAN Business Council, Tobacco Tactics, updated 28 May 2021, accessed 18 April 2024.
The US-ASEAN Business Council is an American trade organisation that promotes American private sector business interests in Southeast Asia, including Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam.1
Relationship with the Tobacco Industry
Membership
Historic tobacco industry documents reveal that Philip Morris International (PMI) has been an US-ASEAN Business Council member since the 1990s, initially to “enhance the image and reputation of the company, its people and business leadership” in the Asian region.234 The most recent evidence shows PMI was still a member in 2017.5
PMI’s former President for the Asia Region, Matteo Pellegrini, represented the tobacco company on the Business Council’s Board of Directors from at least 2010 to 2015.67 In 2015, PMI’s representation on the Council was taken over by Jon Huenemann, PMI’s Vice President U.S. and International Affairs.8 Huenemann also served as Secretary to the Council from 2015-2017.8 By 2019, the representation of PMI in the board of directors moved to J.B. Simko, vice president of external affairs for Philip Morris International, and a member of the board of directors of the United States Council for International Business. 9
PMI’s membership of the US-ASEAN Business Council is consistent with the company’s strategy to grow its presence in Asian markets to secure ‘sustainable volume and margin growth’.10 In 2015, PMI was cigarette market leader in several Southeast Asian countries, including Indonesia (35% market share)11, the Philippines (74%)12, and Singapore (48%)13.
Donations
In 1999, the US-ASEAN Business Council was one of 33 business organisations sponsored by PMI.1415
The year before, the Business Council had received a PMI donation of US$6,500 for so-called “general support”.16 In 1995, the Business Council had received a similar donation of US$5,000 from the tobacco company.17
Facilitating Access to Decision Makers in Southeast Asia
The US-ASEAN Council’s influence in the Asian region is cemented by its official status as ‘supporting organisation’ of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), an intergovernmental organisation that promotes further political and economic integration in the region.1 ASEAN membership includes the region’s Ministers of economy, energy, finance, forestry and agriculture, and the region’s most senior customs officials. As one of ASEAN’s ‘supporting organisations’, the Business Council is allowed to raise member company concerns directly with ASEAN Ministers and senior officials.1
Health advocates have accused the Business Council of giving PMI “direct access to lobby government officials”.18 The Council organises regular ‘business missions’ to specific countries where it facilitates meetings between its members and Ministers and senior officials.1
Access to Senior Government Officials
In March 2017 a Business Council delegation, including PMI, met with Vietnam’s Prime Minister H.E. Nguyen Xuan Phuc to discuss trade and investment.19 This visit was preceded by an earlier meeting hosted by the Business Council in August 2016, soon after the Vietnamese Parliamentary elections, aimed at forging bonds between the Business Council’s members and the newly elected government.20 PMI was present at this meeting. Similarly, in 2016 and 2017 PMI took part in US-ASEAN Business Council meetings with senior Government officials in the Philippines 21, Singapore22, Malaysia23, Thailand24, and Indonesia.25
Access to Senior Custom Officials
In May 2016, PMI was part of a Business Council’s delegation to Cambodia to attend the 25th Meeting of the ASEAN Directors-General of Customs.26 Herman Cheung, PMI Manager Illicit Trade & Prevention, represented PMI at this occasion. KPMG, an accountancy firm who was funded by PMI to carry out research on tobacco illicit trade, was also part of the delegation. Academics have criticised KPMG’s research methodology and data. For more information, see our section on PMI’s Project Star.
Access to Parliamentarians
In May 2021, US-ASEAN Council held a virtual meeting with Parliamentarians in the Philippines including the Speaker of the House of Representatives. The Council’s mission included four representatives of PMFTC Inc., the Philippine affiliate of Philip Morris International. The interventions made by the US-ASEAN Council members included discussions on topics that tobacco industry should not be allowed to discuss according to WHO FCTC Article 5.3 and its implementation guidelines. These topics included: 27 28
- Discussion on a reasonable regulatory framework for heated tobacco products (HTPs)
- Request for Congress to support the implementation of a reasonable regulatory framework for vapor and HTPs.
- Support for combatting illicit trade
Lobbying Against Tobacco Plain Packaging
The US-ASEAN Business Council, like its member PMI, actively opposed the introduction of tobacco plain packaging legislation in several countries, which would see tobacco companies prohibited to use brand logos, colours, and promotional text on their tobacco packaging.
The Business Council lobbied against this tobacco control measure on its own, and as part of a lobby group made up of US business organisations including the US Chamber of Commerce, the National Association of Manufacturers, the Emergency Committee for American Trade, the United States Council for International Business, the National Foreign Trade Council, and the Transatlantic Business Council.29
Importantly, in all its correspondence with government officials on plain packaging, the Business Council failed to declare its relationship with PMI.
In December 2015, the Business Council responded to a public consultation launched by Singapore’s Ministry of Health on new tobacco control measures, including plain packaging.30 In its consultation submission, the Business Council claimed that plain packaging would “violate Singapore’s obligations to protect IPR”, and serve as “unnecessary obstacles to trade”.31
In earlier submissions to the Australian and New Zealand governments3233 the Business Council had used the same arguments. In addition, in its submission to the Australian government, the Council also argued that it would encourage illicit tobacco trade and that there was little evidence to suggest that the measure would have a public health benefit.32 In its New Zealand submission, the Business Council also voiced ‘slippery slope’ concerns, suggesting that the law would eventually be replicated to other industries.33
Arguments raised against plain packaging by the Business Council, mirrored those used in the anti-plain packaging campaigns run by the tobacco industry. For more information on the tobacco industry arguments, and a critical assessment of their validity, go to Countering Industry Arguments against Plain Packaging.
Lobbying against the Trans-Pacific Partnership’s Exclusion of Tobacco
The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a trade agreement finalised in 2016 between 12 countries that border the Pacific Ocean and represent about 40% of the world’s economic output.
In 2013, Malaysia proposed that tobacco be excluded from the agreement.34 This exclusion was designed to prevent tobacco companies from taking legal action against TPP member countries if countries decided to enact tobacco control measures.
The Business Council, and other US trade organisations, lobbied against Malaysia’s proposal for a tobacco exclusion, calling it ‘unnecessary’ as it supposedly ‘lacked any public-interest justification’, and was ‘highly damaging’ to ‘job-creating sectors’.3536 Despite their lobbying efforts, the tobacco exclusion was adopted in October 2015.
TobaccoTactics Resources
- Countering Industry Arguments against Plain Packaging
- Plain Packaging in Australia
- Plain Packaging in New Zealand
- Lobbying Decision Makers
Relevant Link
- SEATCA briefing on tobacco industry and third party interference in Southeast Asia
- US-ASEAN Business Council homepage
TCRG Research
Lobby groups associated with US-ASEAN Business Council submitted joint statement to UK Consultation on plain packaging. US-ASEAN Business Council was not involved.
- ‘It will harm business and increase illicit trade’: an evaluation of the relevance, quality and transparency of evidence submitted by transnational tobacco companies to the UK consultation on standardised packaging 2012, K. Evans-Reeves, J. Hatchard, A. Gilmore, 2015, Tobacco Control, 24(e2), e168-e177.
