Imperial Brands

This page was last edited on at

Imperial Brands (previously known as Imperial Tobacco, and often referred to simply as Imperial) is a transnational tobacco company (TTC), headquartered in Bristol, United Kingdom (UK).


The Imperial Tobacco Company was formed in 1901, when a consortium of British tobacco manufacturers – the Wills, Player and Lambert and Butler companies – came together to resist an attempt by James Buchanan Duke of the American Tobacco Company to dominate the British market.12 It has produced several products other than tobacco, including beer, prepared foods and packaging.2 In 2016 it changed its name from Imperial Tobacco to Imperial Brands, which in the company’s own words reflects its “expansion into potentially less harmful alternatives to traditional tobacco products.”1

The company has no relationship to Imperial Tobacco Canada, which is a subsidiary of British American Tobacco (BAT).

Major Divisions & Subsidiaries

Imperial Brands has many subsidiaries and its internal structure is complex.3 Some of its major subsidiaries include:

  • The tobacco companies Imperial Tobacco Limited (UK), ITG Brands LLC (US), Altadis S.A.U. (Spain), Reemtsma Cigarettenfabriken GmbH (Germany) and Imperial Tobacco Australia Limited.4
  • Logista, a Spain-listed “distributor of tobacco and other convenience products”, which also provides “freight, parcel and pharmaceutical logistics”.4
  • Fontem Ventures, a Netherlands-listed company focused on “developing innovative vape-based Next Generation Products”.5
  • Nerudia Limited, a research facility based in Liverpool, UK, focused on the development of e-vapour products.4

In 2020, Imperial Brands sold its cigar business Worldwide Premium Cigar (including Tabacalera and Premium Cigar RoW) to reduce the company’s growing debt.6

Imperial’s corporate structure is illustrated in the appendix to this report.


The page Tobacco Industry Product Terminology lists product types and the terms used on Tobacco Tactics.

Conventional tobacco products

Imperial’s main cigarette brands include John Player Special (JPS), Davidoff, Gauloises, West, Winston, Kool, Lambert & Butler (L&B), Fortuna, Nobel and News.7

It also manufactures the roll-your-own (RYO) tobacco Golden Virginia and Champion and the Rizla cigarette papers and filters, as well as skruf, a brand of Swedish-style snus.7

More information can be found on the Imperial Brands corporate website (see link at end of this article).

Production and key markets

The map below (Figure 1) shows the countries in which Imperial operates. The Tobacco Supply Chain database shows that Imperial is directly involved in tobacco leaf agriculture and processing in eight countries, manufactures its products in 30 countries, and has distribution operations in 53 countries.

Map showing global subsidiaries of Imperial Brands.

Figure 1: Map showing the global subsidiaries of Imperial Brands. Source: Tobacco Control Research Group, University of Bath

According to Euromonitor International, in 2023 Imperial had a share of around 6% of the global cigarette market outside China (by retail volume, figure rounded).8

Asia Pacific is by far the largest regional market for cigarettes, making up over one third of the total global market excluding China (regions as defined by Euromonitor). Imperial has a market share of around 10% in this region. However, the vast size of this market means that it accounts for 36% of all Imperial’s cigarette sales. At around 33%, Imperial’s largest market share is in Western Europe; however, this region only represents 16% of total sales.8

Research published in 2023 showed that in 2020 Imperial Brands had the highest cigarette market share in six of the markets in which it operated (out of 90 for which data was available).9

For more information on the global and regional market shares of the ‘Big 4’ transnational companies, see Tobacco Companies.
See the Tobacco Supply Chain database for country specific information.

Newer nicotine and tobacco products

As the harms from smoking conventional products have become better understood, and tobacco control measures have been put in place, the cigarette market – from which tobacco companies make most of their profits – has started to shrink.  To secure the industry’s longer-term future, TTCs have invested in, developed and marketed newer nicotine and tobacco products.10

Imperial’s newer nicotine and tobacco brands include:7

In its corporate materials, Imperial refers to these products as ‘next generation products‘ or NGPs.7

Market Strategy

Focus on conventional products

The vast majority of Imperial’s net revenue – around 97% in 2023  – comes from the sale of cigarettes and other conventional combustible tobacco products.11

In 2021, Imperial announced a new five-year strategy, a year after appointing Stefan Bomhard as CEO. The first of the three “pillars” of this strategy is a “Focus on priority combustible markets”.12 In a presentation to investors, Bomhard stated that Imperial’s combustibles business would “be the biggest contributor to value creation over the next five years.”13

The second pillar is “Driving value from our broader market portfolio”. In 2022-23 Imperial created a new “AAACE region” to include Africa, Asia, Australasia and Central & Eastern Europe, and highlighted the potential for future growth in these markets.4 In its 2023 annual report it stated that Africa has “the potential to make a significant contribution” to its overall success.4

Imperial’s third strategic pillar is to “Build a targeted NGP business”,14 concentrating on markets where newer nicotine products are already “a big proportion of overall nicotine consumption” and where it has “strong existing routes to market.”15 Even so, in Europe, where Imperial has focused its investment in newer products, they still accounted for just 7% of its overall net revenue in 2022.4

Imperial’s five “priority markets” are the US, Germany, Australia, Spain and the UK. As of 2023, these accounted for around 70% of Imperial’s operating profit in cigarettes and other conventional tobacco products,4 with the US and Germany accounting for around half.16 In 2023, Imperial stated that declines in market share in the UK and Germany had been offset by increases in its other three priority markets.417

Africa accounts for 8% Imperial’s operating profit, while Central and Eastern Europe account for 4%.16

In 2022, Imperial withdrew from both Japan and Russia. It stated that its Japanese business “remained small and unprofitable” even after a decade of investment.4 It sold its Russian operations to local investors in April 2022 following the Russian invasion of Ukraine.418 This also resulted in the company closing its operations in several Central Asian markets which depended on its Russian supply chain.4

Imperial had by far the smallest market share in Russia of the Big 4 – and so had less to lose than some of its competitors who have remained in the country.1920 Imperial acknowledged the “limited profit contribution” of the Russian and Ukrainian markets.21

Share buybacks

A key goal remains delivering financial returns to shareholders, including via share buybacks.22 In 2022, Imperial announced the start of a share buyback programme, in line with its “five-year strategy to deliver sustainable growth and enhanced shareholder returns.”23 The first GB£1 billion buyback was completed in September 2023. The following month, Imperial announced its intention to repurchase another GB£1.1 billion in shares by the end of September 2024.24 The buybacks reflect operating profit growth, driven by tobacco prices high enough to offset falling sales.25

  • Imperial Brands’ annual reports, presentations and information for investors can be found on its corporate website (link at end of this article).


Tobacco industry interference is widely understood to be the greatest barrier to progress in reducing the deadly health impact of tobacco.26 Article 5.3 of the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) obliges countries to protect their health policies from the “commercial and other vested interests of the tobacco industry”.27

TCRG has identified a range of tactics used by tobacco companies to interfere with and undermine tobacco control, in order to further their commercial goals.2829

Undermining national or international laws

Imperial has been accused of violating tobacco control laws in multiple countries.

Circumvention of EU menthol ban with new products

The 2014 EU Tobacco Products Directive Revision, passed into UK law in 2016, banned the sale of menthol cigarettes and rolling tobacco.30 Though a four year “phase-out” period was granted following industry lobbying, the regulation came into force in May 2020, and included a ban on “characterising” flavour in tobacco and all components, including filters, capsules, packaging and rolling papers.3132

Imperial has launched several products designed to circumvent the ban, including rebranded JPS Green cigarettes;33 new variants of Lambert & Butler, JPS Players and Embassy cigarettes, with filters designed to deliver “a cooling sensation during smoking”;343536 and a new Rizla flavoured insert to be put into a packet of cigarettes or rolling tobacco, which Imperial argued was an “accessory” and therefore exempt from the menthol ban and other regulations such as the display ban.3738

Provision of smoking shelters at UK airports

To make it easier for people to smoke whilst travelling, yet be seen to comply with smoking bans, Imperial Tobacco launched its Smoking Allowed campaign in 2011, which provided smoking shelters at UK airports.3940

Legal threats and actions

Imperial Tobacco has filed legal challenges against tobacco control regulations in the UK, EU, US and Australia, including:

  • 2020: Tobacco Products; Required Warnings for Cigarette Packages and Advertisements (US). Imperial’s legal challenges have helped to delay implementation of graphic health warnings (GHWs) on tobacco products in the United States.41
  • 2014: EU Tobacco Products Directive (TPD). Imperial Tobacco formally supported a legal challenge brought by Philip Morris International (PMI) and British American Tobacco (BAT) to invalidate the TPD. For more information see TPD: Legal Challenges.
  • 2010: Tobacco and Primary Medical Services (Scotland) ACT. Imperial’s legal challenge delayed the introduction of the retail display ban by two years.4243

See the case study below on legal tactics used against plain packaging in Australia and the UK.

The website Tobacco Control Laws publishes detailed and up to date information about regulation at country level.44
For countries that are parties to the WHO FCTC, progress is detailed in the Implementation Database for the WHO FCTC.


In addition to threatening legal action, tobacco companies often threaten to close down operations – with resulting job losses – in order to exert pressure on policy makers, particularly in LMICs.2829 These threats are often in reaction to proposed tobacco control regulations, such as plain packaging and increases in tobacco taxes.

In 2016, Imperial wrote to the Minister of Health in Burkina Faso, warning the government against the introduction of plain packaging and large graphic health warnings. The letter stated:

“If these measures are brought into effect, the economic and social impact will be extremely negative. They could even threaten the continuation of our factory which has operated in Bobo Dioulasso for more than fifty years with more than 210 salaried employees.”45

However, companies frequently move operations and close factories for business reasons. In 2014, for example, Imperial closed factories in Nottingham, UK and Nantes, France, and shifted production to Poland and Germany, with the aim of saving GB£300 million in costs.46

See also TCRG research on this topic.47

Lobbying and influencing policy

Endgame policies in New Zealand and the UK

In 2021, the New Zealand Ministry of Health ran a consultation on its “Smokefree Aotearoa 2025 Action Plan”, a set of measures designed to reduce smoking prevalence to under 5%.48 Such measures are sometimes referred to as ‘endgame’ policies, in that they involve going beyond tobacco control, towards a goal of eliminating tobacco use entirely.49

In its submission to the consultation, Imperial outlined its opposition to all the principal endgame policies. One such measure was the ‘smokefree generation’ policy, which would have introduced an annually rising smoking age, ensuring that tobacco products could not be legally sold to anyone born on or after 1 January 2009.50 In its response, Imperial Brands Australasia wrote the following:

“We support sensible, evidence-based regulation of tobacco products. The proposal to introduce a smokefree generation is neither of these things. It represents an ideological objective to restrict the free choice of New Zealanders that is unnecessary, impractical and potentially even counterproductive.”51

In the UK, following the announcement of plans to introduce a similar smokefree generation policy in October 2023, lobbyists representing Imperial reportedly engaged MPs from the All-Party Parliamentary Group for Smoking and Health.52 Like in New Zealand, the UK government opened a consultation on the new legislation, to which Imperial submitted a highly critical response.53

EU Tobacco Products Directive

In the financial year 2014-2015, when the EU Tobacco Products Directive (TPD) was undergoing its first revision, Imperial Tobacco reportedly spent EU€400,000 – €499,000 lobbying EU institutions, employing five full-time equivalent staff in its Brussels office.54 Imperial Tobacco met with the European Commission’s Health Directorate, DG SANCO, and Health Commissioner John Dalli,55 as well as five Conservative UK MEPs.565758 For more on the controversies that lead to the resignation of then commissioner Dalli, see TPD: Dalligate.

Imperial Tobacco also lobbied other directorates on the TPD. In 2011, the PR firm Bell Pottinger tried to broker access to officials in DG Trade and the Secretariat General on its behalf.

In 2012, Imperial Tobacco attended meetings with DG ENTR (Enterprise and Industry) as part of a delegation with Tobacco Europe (known as CECCM at the time),5960 and directly with DG Trade.61 With the exception of DG SANCO, EU officials were not systematically transparent about their contact with Imperial Tobacco and other tobacco companies at the time of the 2014 EU TPD Review.62 Some meetings only became public knowledge due to freedom of information (FOI) requests.

Similar concerns have re-emerged in light of the third revision of the TPD, with tobacco control advocates raising concerns about tobacco industry access to EU institutions.

Documents released by the UK Department of Health revealed that Imperial Tobacco had access to confidential information from the European Council concerning the 2014 TPD review.63 Despite being asked to explain how it obtained this confidential information, Imperial refused to disclose its source. For more information, see Imperial Receives Inside Information from the European Council.

Hospitality for politicians

One common tobacco industry tactic is to provide gifts to those who might influence the regulation with which it has to comply.28 Members of both Houses of Parliament in the UK continue to accept tobacco industry hospitality, in contravention of the WHO FCTC. In recent years, Imperial has provided tickets to the tennis at Wimbledon for several MPs and Lords. For more information, see Tobacco Industry Hospitality for UK Politicians.

Political donations

Tobacco companies also make donations to political parties and campaigns.28 Between 2016 and 2024, the political action committee (PAC) of Imperial’s US subsidiary donated nearly US$400,000 to federal candidates from both the Democratic and Republican parties. These include candidates to both the House of Representatives and the Senate.64

Claiming a public health role

Like all three of its main competitors – PMI, BAT and Japan Tobacco International (JTI) – Imperial has attempted to claim a public health role, based largely on its development of newer nicotine and tobacco products. As Imperial Brands Science states on its website:

“As a responsible business, Imperial Brands is committed to making a meaningful contribution to the public health concept of tobacco harm reduction (THR) to address consumer needs and contribute to positive health outcomes.

We therefore offer consumers a broad portfolio of innovative, satisfying and potentially harm reduced Next Generation Products (NGP), manufactured to a high quality and in accordance with recognised safety standards.”65

However, conventional tobacco products remain fundamental to Imperial’s business model. The five-year plan launched in 2021 renewed the company’s focus on cigarettes and limited its investment in newer products to countries where a market for such products already existed (see above section Market Strategy).

  • See harm reduction for details of how tobacco companies use this concept as a tactic to further their commercial goals.

CSR relating to health

In 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic, tobacco companies made extensive use of corporate social responsibility (CSR) campaigns, as a strategy to gain legitimacy, increase public trust and advance their business interests. Imperial Brands was no exception, providing COVID-19 relief in Ukraine and Germany.66

Imperial also contributed US$136,000 to a programme led by the tobacco leaf merchant Universal Leaf in the Philippines, which provided kits with “materials for music, reading, writing, drawing, and sport” to children during the pandemic.4

Support through allies

Like other TTCs, Imperial has long used the third party technique to achieve its goals.

Front groups

Imperial has a history of using front groups to oppose tobacco control legislation:

Think tanks and lobby groups

Imperial has supported various UK and International think tanks, although its financial contribution is not always clear:

  • In response to a query made in 2014 with regard to Imperial’s engagement with the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA), a UK free market think tank with a history of collaboration with the tobacco industry, Imperial’s Head of Regulatory Science replied: “We have been supporters of the IEA for many years, stretching back well over a decade”.67
  • Imperial has also been a donor to the Adam Smith Institute (ASI), another UK free market think tank which has repeatedly opposed tobacco control regulations. In 2013 an Imperial spokesman defended the company’s donations to both the IEA and the ASI: “We believe the contributions of organisations like the ASI and the IEA are very valuable in an open and free society. We respect their work and share their views on many issues.”68
  • Imperial also funded the International Tax and Investment Center (ITIC), “an independent, nonprofit research and education organization” based in the US.69 ITIC has advised high-level government officials worldwide on tobacco taxation. However, following criticism from the WHO and civil society organisations, ITIC cut ties with the tobacco industry in 2017.70
  • It also has historical links with the Democracy Institute, a think tank based in the UK and US. In 2006 the company funded a book published by the Democracy Institute, which argued there was no evidence that graphic health warnings on tobacco, food, and alcohol packaging would work.71 For more information see Countering Industry Arguments Against Plain Packaging: No Evidence Plain Packaging Will Work.

In May 2012, the Tobacco Control Research Group (TCRG) at the University of Bath asked Imperial Tobacco to disclose which think tanks the company was funding or had funded over the previous few years. The company replied that it did “not wish to participate in your research”.72

See the lists of front groups, think tanks, lobby groups and other organisations linked to Imperial in the Affiliations section below.
See also the list and map of tobacco industry allies on the STOP website.


The term ‘‘astroturfing’ refers to the faking of a grassroots movement in order to influence public opinion. Typically, a third-party runs a campaign on behalf of a tobacco company while hiding industry involvement and funding. This is a well-known tactic used to interfere with tobacco control legislation.28

In August 2023, Imperial, along with BAT New Zealand, supported an apparently grassroots initiative led by convenience store owners called “Save Our Stores”. This campaign claimed that the new tobacco control measures proposed in the Smokefree Aotearoa 2025 plan would force small businesses to close.73 The campaign website included the claim that more than 6,000 shops in New Zealand relied on tobacco sales for up to 55% of their revenue – a figure based on a survey carried out by Imperial.74 For more information see Tobacco Industry Interference with Endgame Policies.

A similar campaign called “Save Our Shops” was run in the UK in 2008 against the ban on displaying tobacco products in retail outlets. It was led by the Tobacco Retailers’ Alliance, an offshoot of the Tobacco Manufacturers’ Association, of which Imperial is a member.75

In February 2019, Imperial made use of the European Commission’s “Citizens’ Initiative”, funding a campaign called “Let’s demand smarter vaping regulation!”.7677 One of the campaign organisers was Imperial’s head of EU corporate affairs and a registered lobbyist, while others were representatives of e-cigarette trade associations of which Imperial was a member.76 Yet it was portrayed as a “grassroots” campaign.78 For more information see E-cigarettes: Imperial Brands.

Case study: plain packaging

The introduction of plain packaging legislation in Australia and the UK provides several examples of Imperial using a range of tactics to oppose the policy and protect its commercial interests.

Legal threats and actions

In 2009, Imperial threatened the UK government with legal action over an amendment to the health bill aiming at banning branded cigarette packets. For details see Plain Packaging in the UK.

In 2011, Imperial challenged Australia’s plain packaging legislation in the High Court, arguing that it would only benefit criminals and have negative impacts on revenue for both retailers and government. For details see Australia: Challenging Legislation.

Lobbying and influencing policy

In June 2012, Imperial Tobacco attempted to influence UK Members of Parliaments’ (MPs) views on the plain packaging debate by running an anti-plain packaging advertising campaign in The House, a magazine delivered directly to MPs, peers and civil servants.79 The company did not reveal itself as the funder anywhere on the front-page advertisement. For more information on Imperial Tobacco’s advertorial, and the debate it sparked, see Imperial Tobacco Promotes Opposition to Plain Packaging.

Front groups and astroturfing

In 2010, Imperial Tobacco Australia (in collaboration with PMI and BAT) financed the Alliance of Australian Retailers (AAR) to oppose the introduction of plain packaging.80 The AAR claimed to represent the owners of local corner stores, milk bars, newsagents and service stations, but did not reveal that it was financed by tobacco companies and run by tobacco company executives and a PR company.81 The purpose of the AAR was to argue that plain packaging would cause economic damage to small Australian retailers. For more information on this front group, and Imperial Tobacco Australia’s involvement, visit the Alliance of Australian Retailers page.

Undermining legislation

In September 2012, a few months before plain packaging legislation was introduced in Australia, Imperial Tobacco Australia changed the packaging of its Peter Stuyvesant cigarette pack to show a ripped pack exposing plain packaging underneath. The accompanying slogan said “it’s what’s on the inside that counts”.8283 The Australian Health Minister criticised Imperial’s marketing campaign, saying that “diseased lungs, hearts, and arteries are the reality of what is happening on the inside to a smoker”.82 For more detail on Imperial’s “it’s what’s on the inside that counts” campaign, go to Plain Packaging: Imperial Tobacco Australia Pre-empts Legislation.

Discrediting science and scientists

As part of their legal challenges against plain packaging legislation in the UK, tobacco companies including Imperial attempted to dismiss the evidence of researchers advising the government as unreliable because they were members of the public health community. Ultimately, this argument was dismissed by the high court.84

Controversial marketing

Targeting youth

In its response to the UK government consultation on creating a smokefree generation and tackling youth vaping, Imperial stated:

“Without exception, IMB supports legislation – and enforcement of that legislation – preventing sales to minors. Our International Marketing Standard is unequivocal and prohibits the sales of tobacco products to those under 18 years of age in the UK.”53

However, Imperial has been accused of targeting youth in its marketing activities around the world.85

Imperial Brands has also used social media – with its mostly young audience – to market cigarettes. For example, a campaign launched to promote Davidoff in Bosnia, Malaysia and Egypt is reported to have been viewed more than 24 million times.8687

Targeting women and girls

Women smoke less than men globally, although the gap is narrowing.88 They remain a key demographic for tobacco companies, who have identified packaging and brand design as important ways to appeal to women. TTCs have therefore launched brands specifically aimed at women, often using the terms “light” or “slim”, reinforcing an association of smoking with beauty, glamour and weight loss.89

In 2011, Imperial launched a new Richmond product in the UK called SuperSlims, promoted as “the first superslim brand in the value-price cigarette sector”.90 At the time, The Grocer retail magazine reported that the pack was embossed with a “stylish pink design”, and that it was “clearly designed to appeal to female smokers”.90 Tobacco companies use similar tactics to target women and girls in low and middle-income countries.919293

Targeting minority groups

Imperial’s US subsidiary ITG Brands was formed in 2015 when Imperial acquired the cigarette brands Winston, Salem, Kool and Maverick, as well as the blu e-cigarette brand. Kool, a brand of menthol cigarettes, has long been targeted at Black people in the US. Studies from the US have shown that 80% of Black people who smoke prefer menthol cigarettes, and Kool was the only significant menthol brand in the US for over two decades.9495

ITG has stated that it “does not target any individual demographic group as part of its marketing and advertising practices”.96 However, as the corporate website of its parent company states:

“It [Kool] maintained a dominant position in the [menthol] category throughout much of the 20th Century and was synonymous with the US jazz scene of the 1970s and 80s. Even today, Kool is particularly popular among the menthol smokers of Louisiana, the birthplace of jazz.

By building on this unrivalled heritage, we’re working hard to unlock Kool’s full potential and to restore its market position.”7

Recent Kool marketing for its ‘non-menthol’ variant, sold to consumers as “Your answer to California’s menthol ban”, also suggests that Imperial continues to target African Americans.97

ITG marketing for Kool "non-menthol" variant

Image: ITG marketing for Kool non-menthol variant. Source: Stanford University Research into the Impact of Tobacco Advertising, 2024.

These non-menthol variants in the US, which contain a chemical additive with a similar cooling effect to menthol, also recall tactics used by Imperial to circumvent the menthol ban in the UK and EU.9899

Corporate social responsibility

In the 2023 financial year, Imperial funded CSR projects in 11 countries, across areas such as childcare, education, water, sanitation and hygiene.4

Environment & greenwashing

CSR activities relating to the environment are a way for companies to greenwash their reputations.

Some of Imperial’s CSR programmes in LMICs are centred around farming. In Malawi, for example, it has run initiatives on alternative crops to tobacco,100 soil erosion,101 forestry,102 water stewardship103 and solar boreholes.104

Other CSR activities relate to the waste that the industry creates. In 2011, Imperial Tobacco co-founded the Love Where You Live campaign in the UK, on which it partnered with the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA).105


In its 2023 Annual Report, Imperial stated that it had been recognised as a “Climate Leader” by the Financial Times for the third successive year. Similarly, it received an A rating from the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) for a fourth successive year.4

However, these schemes are voluntary, and there is no globally agreed protocol for assessing companies’ performance on Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) issues. Companies may therefore cherry pick the schemes likely to provide them with a positive rating. For example, when Imperial received a poor rating from CDP Forests in 2017, it simply opted out.106

Exploitative practices

Despite being a member and funder of the Eliminating Child Labour in Tobacco-Growing Foundation (ECLT) since 2001, alongside the other TTCs and major leaf merchants,107108 Imperial has been accused of complicity in child labour and the exploitation of farmers in its supply chain.

In 2020, a legal case was brought against Imperial and BAT by over 7,000 Malawian farmers –  including over 3,000 children – who were represented by the UK legal firm Leigh Day.109

The farmers allege that Imperial and BAT “facilitate unlawful and dangerous conditions, in which they, having been trafficked from their villages, have to build their own homes, live on a daily small portion of maize, work 6am to midnight seven days a week, and have to borrow money to be able to feed their families throughout the season.”109 They also allege that the tobacco companies “know, or ought to know, that the conditions they are faced with leave them no choice but to rely on their children to work as child labourers in extremely hazardous conditions”.109

Imperial and BAT attempted to have the case dismissed, but this was rejected by the UK High Court in June 2021.109110111 Though Imperial and BAT had stated that they could trace the tobacco to the farms where it was grown, in fact those records were only held by the leaf-buying companies which supplied the two TTCs.110

The case is ongoing. Both companies deny the allegations.

Influencing science

Tobacco companies have a long history of attempting to influence science, in order to cast doubt on evidence demonstrating the harmful effects of their products and to argue against regulation.112 This has encompassed both funding their own science, as well as attacking research which is perceived as damaging to tobacco industry interests.

Discrediting science and scientists

In 2011, Imperial Tobacco strongly criticised a study commissioned by the UK Department of Health,113 which concluded that England’s 2007 smoking ban had had positive benefits for public health. The study also concluded that the legislation had had no obvious negative impacts on the hospitality industry, contrary to claims made by the tobacco industry.114

Imperial Tobacco criticised the three-year review as being “lazy and deliberately selective”, and accused the study’s author, Professor Linda Bauld, of having a conflict of interest due to her links to the charity Action on Smoking and Health (ASH).115 Imperial’s attacks on Professor Bauld are part of a pattern of tobacco industry attempts to discredit public health researchers, depicting them as misguided “fundamentalists” producing work which is biased, careless and of poor quality.84

Using FOI requests to counter health campaigns/acquire research data

In February and March 2011, acting on behalf of Imperial Tobacco, the PR firm Bell Pottinger persistently requested access to research data that supported an anti-RYO tobacco health campaign run by regional charity SmokeFree South West.116117 This is an example of the tobacco industry using freedom of information requests to obstruct the progress of tobacco control campaigning and research.

Commissioning research and funding scientists

Imperial has commissioned a number of research papers in recent years, much of which is focused on newer nicotine and tobacco products. Some examples include:

  • An 2024 study on nicotine pouches published in the medical science journal Cureus.118
  • A 2023 study on whether Imperial’s myblu e-cigarettes might serve as a “gateway” into cigarette smoking, published in the journal Drug Testing and Analysis. It was funded by Fontem US LLC, an Imperial subsidiary and the manufacturer of the myblu products analysed.119
  • Also in 2023, a paper published in Toxicology in Vitro compared levels of harmful and potentially harmful constituents in heated tobacco product (HTP) aerosols and cigarette smoke.120

Imperial has also funded research companies. Between 2017 and 2019, Imperial (via its subsidiary Fontem Ventures) funded the Centre for Substance Use Research (CSUR), a research consultancy based in Glasgow, Scotland.10 CSUR has also received funding from BAT, PMI, JUUL Labs and the PMI-funded Foundation for a Smoke-Free World.

Imperial also funded the German laboratory Analytisch-biologisches Forschungslabor (ABF Lab) to publish a paper in 2017, while in 2019 ABF Lab listed Imperial as a funder of an ongoing project.10

Involvement in the illicit tobacco trade

Imperial has repeatedly argued that tobacco control measures lead to an increase in the illicit tobacco trade. The company made these claims in its 2012 and 2014 submissions to the UK Consultations on standardised packaging, and reproduced similar arguments in its response to the proposed tobacco endgame measures in New Zealand and the UK (see section “Endgame policies in New Zealand and UK”). For more information see Industry Arguments Against Plain Packaging and Tobacco Industry Interference with Endgame Policies.

However, while Imperial presents itself as a victim of illicit trade, there is strong historical evidence of its complicity in smuggling its own cigarettes.

In 2021, Imperial (alongside BAT) was reportedly found to be oversupplying its products in Mali through a local subsidiary and accused of supporting conflict in the area by fuelling the illicit trade. In response, Imperial stated that it is committed to opposing tobacco smuggling, which “benefits no-one but the criminals involved”.121

In 2003, a senior Imperial director was charged by German authorities following a raid on Imperial’s German subsidiary Reemtsma by police and customs officials. The raid was part of an investigation into the smuggling of illicit cigarettes to various countries, reportedly including Iraq, though it was under international trade sanctions at the time.122123 Imperial said that the suspected offences took place before its acquisition of Reemtsma in 2002.123

In 2002, genuine Imperial Tobacco brands accounted for more than half of the 17 billion cigarettes smuggled into the UK.124 When questioned about oversupplying countries notorious for smuggling at the Commons Public Accounts Committee, Imperial claimed ignorance, to which one MP responded: “One comes to the conclusion that you are either crooks or you are stupid, and you do not look very stupid.”125

Internal documents from Gallaher (now part of JTI) also refer to Imperial Tobacco’s “highly aggressive” smuggling activities in the 1990s, blaming Imperial’s smuggling for Gallaher’s weakening position in the UK market.126

Price and tax

Tax avoidance

In an investigation published by the Investigative Desk in 2020, the authors stated that “IB’s [Imperial Brands’] annual reports are so untransparent that their actual UK tax burden is virtually impossible to determine.”3 The same report found that Imperial had used group relief, based partly on internal loans, as a means of reducing its corporation tax bill. The authors estimated that Imperial had managed to reduce its payments by an estimated GB£1.8 billion between 2010 and 2020.3

Another study suggested that Imperial only paid an effective corporation tax rate of 20.45% between 2012 and 2019 – and generally much lower – though the rate due during this period was usually significantly higher.127

As of 2023, Imperial was the subject of a legal challenge from French tax authorities, which could lead to additional liabilities to the company of GB£254 million including tax, interest and penalties.34

Pricing strategies

In October 2023, Imperial said it was on track with financial targets, with higher prices helping to offset lower sales of conventional tobacco products.17

One of Imperial’s “operational levers” to drive sales across its five priority markets is to “Optimise the value segment”.4 In the UK, this has involved launching new products like the Embassy Signature roll-your-own (RYO) tobacco. RYO tobacco now accounts for nearly 46% of tobacco sales in the UK according to the retail press, indicating a significant shift in consumer preference.128129 This shift is partly attributed to the lower taxation on RYO tobacco compared to factory-made cigarettes, as highlighted by a 2018 study. The study recommended increasing RYO tobacco taxes to reduce price differentials and curb its attractiveness to consumers.130

Other strategies targeting the value segment in the UK include launching packs of 21 cigarettes (instead of the standard 20) and 32g pouches of RYO tobacco (instead of the standard 30g), as well as Players Max, a new brand of cigarettes 12% longer than standard kingsize.131132 These strategies aim to offer more perceived value to consumers while maintaining competitive pricing.

Non-Nicotine Subsidiaries & Investments

In 2018, Imperial invested in Oxford Cannabinoid Technologies, a UK medical cannabis research company. It did not disclose the value of the investment, though it has been reported that Imperial holds nearly 11% of the company.133134 The following year, it announced a partnership with the Canadian cannabis company Auxly Cannabis Group, which saw Imperial take a 20% stake of the company over three years.135

Key Employees and Board Members

During 2019, Imperial Tobacco underwent significant changes in leadership and strategy. On 3 October 2019, it was announced that Alison Cooper, Imperial Tobacco’s Chief Executive since May 2010, would step down.136 The announcement came after the company issued a profit warning that reduced the company’s anticipated revenue growth.137

In July 2020, Stefan Bomhard was appointed as the Chief Executive Officer on a five-year contract. Bomhard had previously held leadership roles at various multinational companies including Bacardi Europe, Cadbury and car dealership Inchape.138139

The following work, or have worked, for Imperial Brands:
Roberto Ascoli | Drago Azinovic | Arthur van Benthem | Ken Burnett | Sue Clark | Helen Clatworthy | Fernando Domínguez | Robert Dyrbus | Gareth Davis | Louise Day | Kevin Freudenthal | Roberto Funari | David Haines | Michael Herlihy | Nikos Mertzanidis | Peter Middleton | Almos Molnar | Susan Murray | Iain Napier | Matthew Phillips | Walter Prinz | Michiel Reerink | Richard Ross | Berge Setrakian | Alessandro Tschirkov | Mark Williamson | Titus Wouda Kuipers | Colin Wragg | Malcolm Wyman | Waldemar Zegar

A full list of the company’s leadership team can be accessed on Imperial Brands’ website.


Imperial Brands is a member of various national and international organisations and networks. It also works with think tanks and other lobbying organisations, and employs a wide range of consultants.


Imperial Brands is or has been a member of the following organisations (including those listed as affiliations with Fontem Ventures):140141

The American Chamber of Commerce in Moldova142 | The American Chamber of Commerce Ukraine143 | The Anti-Counterfeiting Group (ACG)144 | Asia Pacific Travel Retail Association (APTRA)145 | Associate Parliamentary Corporate Responsibility Group | Association of Business Service Leaders146 | Association of Convenience Stores (ACS) | Australian Association of Convenience Stores147 | Australian Lotteries and Newsagents Association147 | British Chamber of Commerce in Belgium | British Chamber of Commerce Czech Republic148 | BusinessEurope | Confederation of Industry of the Czech Republic149 | Cooperation Centre for Scientific Research Relative to Tobacco (CORESTA) | Eliminating Child Labour in Tobacco-Growing Foundation (ECLT) | Euraffex/European Affairs Expertise140 | European Rolling Papers Association (ERPA)140 | European Cigar Manufacturers Association (ECMA) | European Smoking Tobacco Association (ESTA) | European Smokeless Tobacco Council | European Travel Retail Confederation (ETRC) | Irish Tobacco Manufacturers Advisory Committee (Itmac)150 | Industry and Parliament Trust (see Rosemary Brook)151 | Institute of Business Ethics152 | Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA) | Kangaroo Group | MARQUES | Public Affairs Council140 | Scottish Grocers’ Federation (SGF) | Slave-Free Alliance153 | Society of European Affairs Professionals (SEAP)154 | Tobacco and Nicotine Products Chemicals Group (previously Tobacco Industry Platform)155 | Tobacco Europe (formerly CECCM) | Tobacco Manufacturers’ Association | UK Vaping Industry Association (UKVIA) | Vereninging Sigaretten en Kerf (VSK)156 | Wirtschaftsrat140

Other funded organisations

Imperial Brands is known to have funded, directly or indirectly, the following:

See also the STOP database and map of industry allies, available on


Imperial Brands is known to have used the following companies and consultancies for public relations, lobbying, marketing, research or other consultancy services:140157158159160161

Aspect Consulting | Burson Cohn & Wolfe (BCW) | Bell Pottinger | FTI Consulting  | Instinctif Partners | Nudge Factory Ltd | Calacus

Relevant Link

Tobacco Tactics Resources

TCRG Research

For a comprehensive list of all TCRG publications, including TCRG research that evaluates the impact of public health policy, go to the Bath TCRG’s list of publications.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email


  1. abImperial Brands, The history of our challenger brands, 2024, accessed April 2024
  2. abEncyclopaedia Britannia, Imperial Brands PLC, Britannica Money, 2 April 2024, accessed April 2024
  3. abcdS.Vermeulen, M. Dillen, J.R. Branston, Big Tobacco, Big Avoidance, 2020, University of Bath/Investigative Desk
  4. abcdefghijklmnopImperial Brands, Annual Report and Accounts 2023, December 11 2023
  5. Imperial Brands, Imperial Brands Science, 2024, accessed March 2024
  6. Imperial Brands, Imperial Brands PLC agrees sale of Worldwide Premium Cigar Business for €1,225 million with proceeds to be used to reduce debt, 27 April 2020, accessed March 2021
  7. abcdeImperial Brands, Brands of Choice, 2024, accessed March 2024
  8. abEuromonitor International, Cigarette market company share 2023, accessed May 2024 (subscription)
  9. N.B. Rajani, J. Hoelscher, A.A. Laverty, F.T Filippidis, A multi-country analysis of transnational tobacco companies’ market share, Tobacco Induced Diseases, 2023 Jan 20;21:03, doi: 10.18332/tid/157090
  10. abcSTOP, Addiction At Any Cost: The Truth About Philip Morris International, 20 February 2020, accessed January 2021
  11. Imperial Brands, Full Year Results Statement, Report for the Year Ended 30 September 2023, 14 November 2023, accessed May 2024
  12. Imperial Brands, Annual Report and Accounts 2021, accessed March 2024
  13. Imperial Brands, CAGNY Presentation Script, 18 February 2021, accessed March 2024
  14. Imperial Brands, Our Transformation to Unlock Value, 18 February 2021, accessed March 2024
  15. G. Gay, Mapping Milestones, Tobacco Reporter, 1 April 2024, accessed April 2024
  16. abImperial Brands, A Challenger Mindset – CAGNY 2023, accessed March 2024
  17. abH. Saker-Clark, Tobacco firm Imperial Brands ‘on track’ after price increases, The Independent, 5 October 2023, accessed April 2024
  18. Imperial Brands, Russia Update, press release, 20 April 2022, accessed January 2024
  19. O. Barnes, Imperial Brands takes £400mn-plus hit to profits as it pulls out of Russia, Financial Times, 15 November 2022, accessed March 2024
  20. Euromonitor International, Company Shares 2017-2022, accessed January 2024 (paywall)
  21. Imperial Brands, Update on Russia and revised guidance, press release, 15 March 2022, accessed January 2024
  22. B. Curry, Stock Buybacks: How Companies Create Value For Shareholders, Forbes, 14 June 2023, accessed March 2024
  23. Imperial Brands, Imperial Brands announces buyback programme and affirms trading in line with expectations, press release, 6 October 2022, accessed March 2024
  24. Imperial Brands, Share Buyback Tranche of up to £550 Million, London Stock Exchange, 6 October 2023, accessed March 2024
  25. C. Akers, Imperial Brands launches share buyback after UK ban, Investors’ Chronicle, 5 October 2023, accessed March 2024
  26. World Health Organization, Tobacco industry interference with tobacco control, 22 May 2008. ISBN:9789241597340
  27. World Health Organization, WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, 2003
  28. abcdeS. Ulucanlar, G.J. Fooks, A.B. Gilmore, The Policy Dystopia Model: An Interpretive Analysis of Tobacco Industry Political Activity, PLoS Med, 2016; 13(9): e1002125, doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002125
  29. abB.K. Matthes, K. Lauber, M. Zatoński, et al, Developing more detailed taxonomies of tobacco industry political activity in low-income and middle-income countries: qualitative evidence from eight countriesBMJ Global Health, 2021;6:e004096, doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004096
  30. UK Government, The Tobacco and Related Products Regulations 2016, Statutory Instrument, 20 May 2016, accessed March 2024
  31. Smoke-Free Partnership, SFP Press release: Tobacco Products Directive enters into force: the start of a new stage for tobacco control in Europe, 20 May 2016, accessed March 2024
  32. European Commission, Directive 2014/40/EU Of The European Parliament And Of The Council, 3 April 2014, accessed March 2024
  33. E. Cronin, Imperial Tobacco Unveils New Innovations for 2018, Talking Retail, 24 November 2017, accessed March 2024
  34. Imperial Tobacco launches New Crush variants for L&B Blue and JPS Players, Cash & Carry Management, 13 October 2020, accessed March 2024
  35. E. Cronin, Imperial Tobacco supports menthol smokers with New Crush launch, Talking Retail, 26 February 2021, accessed March 2024
  36. Cool the Senses with Imperial’s New Crush Fusion Range, Grocery Trader, 8 January 2024, accessed March 2024
  37. Imperial launches Rizla flavour cards ahead of menthol cigarette ban, Convenience Store, 17 December 2019, accessed March 2024
  38. Rizla, Our Xtreme flavour cards have launched – everything you need to know!, 14 November 2022, accessed March 2024
  39. New Imperial Tobacco campaign makes debut at Bristol Airport, The Moodie Davitt Report, 24 November 2011, accessed April 2024
  40. Imperial Tobacco opens airside smoking balcony at Birmingham Airport, Talking Retail, 8 June 2012, accessed April 2024
  41. R. Craver, Tobacco manufacturers lose appellate ruling on graphic warning labels, Winston-Salem Journal, 22 March 2024, accessed March 2024
  42. Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, Imperial Tobacco Ltd. v. The Lord Advocate (Scotland), Tobacco Control Laws, 12 December 2012, accessed March 2024
  43. R. Macpherson, M. Ross, Case Comment: Imperial Tobacco Ltd v Lord Advocate (Scotland) [2012] UKSC 61, UK Supreme Court Blog, 16 January 2013, accessed March 2024
  44. Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids, Tobacco Control Laws
  45. S. Boseley, Threats, bullying, lawsuits: tobacco industry’s dirty war for the African market, The Guardian, 12 July 2017, accessed March 2024
  46. D. Robinson, H. Carnegy, Imperial Tobacco to cut jobs and shut factories in UK and France, Financial Times, 15 April 2014, accessed June 2024
  47. B.K. Matthes, R. Alebshehy, A.B. Gilmore, “They try to suppress us, but we should be louder”: a qualitative exploration of intimidation in tobacco control, Globalization & Health, 19:88,  2023, doi: 10.1186/s12992-023-00991-0
  48. Smokefree New Zealand, Smokefree Aotearoa 2025, last updated 24 October 2023, accessed March 2024
  49. P.A. McDaniel, E.A. Smith, R.E. Malone, The tobacco endgame: a qualitative review and synthesis, Tobacco Control, 2016;25:594-604, doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052356
  50. T. McClure, New Zealand passes world-first tobacco law to ban smoking for next generation, The Guardian, 13 December 2022, accessed March 2024
  51. New Zealand Ministry of Health, Consultation on Proposals for a Smokefree Aotearoa 2025 Action Plan: Email submissions part 1, 2021, accessed March 2024
  52. D. Parsley, R. Vaughan, Revealed: Big Tobacco’s campaign to block Rishi Sunak’s smoking ban, The i, 1 December 2023, accessed March 2024
  53. abImperial Brands, A Summary of Imperial Brands’ Response to the DHSC Consultation: Creating a Smokefree Generation and Tackling Youth Vaping, 6 December 2023, accessed March 2024
  54. European Commission Transparency Register, Imperial Brands PLC, last updated 16 December 2020, accessed March 2024
  55. DG SANCO, Minutes of Meeting Between Commissioner Dalli and Representatives of the economic stakeholders active in tobacco products on 7 March 2012, accessed March 2021
  56. Conservative Europe, Lobbying Contacts Report 1st January-30th June 2011
  57. Conservative Europe, Lobbying Contacts Report 1st July-31th December 2011
  58. Conservative Europe, Lobbying Contacts Report 1st January-30th June 2013
  59. DG ENTR, Email to DG ENTR colleagues, 12 July 2012 6:45PM, Subject: Réunion CECCM 12/07 9h30-10h30, released under freedom of information request 2013-5964
  60. DG ENTR, Email to DG ENTR colleagues, 5 September 2012, Subject: Meeting report- Tobacco industry 05/09 10h00-10h30, released under freedom of information request 2013-5964
  61. F. Bernandini, Email to DG Trade colleagues, 15 October 2012 15:03, Subject: Flash report meeting Imperial Tobacco 12 October 2012, released under freedom of information request 2013-3874
  62. S. Peeters, H. Costa, D Stuckler et al, The revision of the 2014 European tobacco products directive: an analysis of the tobacco industry’s attempts to ‘break the health silo’, Tobacco Control, 2016,25(1):108-117, doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051919
  63. R. Ross, Subject: European Tobacco Products Directive & Plain Pack, 9 April 2013, accessed March 2021
  64. Open Secrets, ITG Brands PAC Contributions to Federal Candidates, 2023, accessed March 2024
  65. T. Nahde, Our Science Story, Imperial Brands Science, 2024, accessed March 2024
  66. E. Filtenborg, S. Weichert, Tobacco giants fume over claims they exploited COVID-19 with Romania, Greece and Ukraine donations, EuroNews, 8 June 2020, accessed March 2021
  67. S. Stotesbury, Head of Regulatory Science, Imperial Tobacco, Email to Tobacco Control Research Group, University of Bath, 25 March 2014
  68. J. Doward, Health groups dismayed by news ‘big tobacco’ funded rightwing thinktanks, The Observer, 1 June 2013, accessed March 2024
  69. International Tax and Investment Center, Who We Are, 2023, accessed March 2024
  70. P. McClean, Big Tobacco lobby group quits smoking industry, Financial Times, 19 May 2017, accessed March 2024
  71. J. Luik, A Picture of Health? Why Graphic Warnings Don’t Work, The Democracy Institute, 2006, accessed March 2017
  72. A. Parsons, Imperial Tobacco, Email to Tobacco Control Research Group, University of Bath, 25 May 2012
  73. Save Our Stores, Who Are We, undated, archived August 2023, accessed March 2024
  74. Imperial Brands, Experimental Smoking Bill Will Force Over 4,000 Dairies Into Closure, press release, Scoop Independent News, 28 November 2022, accessed March 2024
  75. The Tobacco Manufacturers’ Association, Homepage, undated, accessed March 2024
  76. abEuropean Union Commission, EU Commission Citizens Initiative, 20 February 2019, accessed March 2024
  77. European Parliament, Revision of the Tobacco Products Directive 2014/40/EU, 3 April 2014, accessed March 2021
  78., Sign the European Citizens’ Initiative, undated, archived 1 May 2019, accessed March 2021
  79. The House, Parliament’s Magazine, Dods, No. 1419, Vol 36, 14 June 2012, accessed June 2012
  80. ABC News, Leaks reveal $9m tobacco blitz, 11 September 2010, accessed March 2021
  81. A. Davies, Big Tobacco hired public relations firm to lobby government, The Sydney Morning Herald, 11 September 2010, accessed March 2021
  82. abS. Gardiner, Plain package row: tobacco company resorts to ‘sick joke’, 12 September 2012, accessed March 2021
  83. J. Pearlman, Australian tobacco accused of ‘sick joke’, 12 September 2012, accessed March 2021
  84. abK.A. Evans-Reeves, A.B. Gilmore, A. Rowell, Industry-funded International Tax and Investment Center responds to criticism by attempting to muddy the waters, Tobacco Control blog, 24 June 2016, accessed March 2024
  85. J.L. Brown, D. Rosen, M.G. Carmona, et al, Spinning a global web: tactics used by Big Tobacco to attract children at tobacco points-of-sale, Tobacco Control, 2022;32:645-651, doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-057095
  86. STOP, 10 Ways the Tobacco Industry Targets Youth,, 20 May 2020, accessed June 2024
  87. Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids: New Investigation Exposes How Tobacco Companies Market Cigarettes on Social Media in the U.S. and Around the World, PR Newswire, 27 August 2018, accessed June 2024
  88. Tobacco Atlas, Prevalence, undated, accessed March 2024
  89. J. Doxey, D. Hammond, Deadly in pink: the impact of cigarette packaging among young women, Tobacco Control 2011;20:353-360, doi: 10.1136/tc.2010.038315
  90. abH. Gilbert, Now Imperial offers the ladies a stylish new cigarette brand, The Grocer, 6 August 2011, accessed August 2011
  91. G.F. Gil, L.S. Flor, E. Gakidou, How Tobacco Advertising Woos Women, Think Global Health, 30 May 2021, accessed March 2024
  92. STOP, Women and the Tobacco Industry,, 8 March 2021, accessed June 2024
  93. E. Feeny, K. Dain, C. Varghese et al, Protecting women and girls from tobacco and alcohol promotion, BMJ, 2021; 374 :n1516, doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1516
  94. P. Garber, Citing Health Of African Americans, Menthol Cigarettes May Be Banned, Medium, 24 June 2023, accessed March 2024
  95. Stanford Research into the Impact of Tobacco Advertising, Collection: Kool is Hot, 2024, accessed March 2024
  96. C. Behrens, Former Columbus Mayor Michael Coleman has personal reason to seek menthol cigarette ban, The Columbus Dispatch, 21 June 2022, accessed March 2023
  97. Stanford Research into the Impact of Tobacco Advertising, Collection: Non-Menthol, 2024, accessed March 2024
  98. Y. Noguchi, With a federal menthol ban looming, tobacco companies push ‘non-menthol’ substitutes, NPR, 21 March 2024, accessed April 2024
  99. J. Briggs, “USA: tobacco companies target customers with menthol alternatives to circumvent upcoming California sales ban”, in Worldwide news and comment, Tobacco Control 2023;32:271-274, doi: 10.1136/tc-2023-058068
  100. Imperial Brands, Promoting crop diversity to protect farmer livelihoods, 28 November 2019, accessed March 2024
  101. Imperial Brands, Guarding against soil erosion, 25 November 2019, accessed March 2024
  102. Imperial Brands, Enhancing biodiversity through forestry, 25 November 2019, accessed March 2024
  103. Imperial Brands, Enhancing farmer livelihoods through water, 13 December 2019, accessed March 2024
  104. Imperial Brands, Solar boreholes in Malawi, 16 December 2018, accessed March 2024
  105. Staff writer, Keep Britain Tidy launches ‘Love Where You Live’ ads, The Drum, 20 September 2011, accessed February 2017
  106. STOP, Talking Trash: Behind the Tobacco Industry’s “Green” Public Relations, Issue Brief,, May 2022
  107. ECLT Foundation, Publications, 2024, accessed March 2024
  108. ECLT Foundation, Annual Report 2022, accessed March 2024
  109. abcdLeigh Day, Court allows Malawian child farmer claims against British American Tobacco and Imperial to proceed, Leigh Day website, 25 June 2021, accessed March 2024
  110. abEWHC, Milasi Josiya & 7,262 others v British American Tobacco and Imperial Tobacco, High Court case document, 25 June 2021
  111. S. Bosely, UK tobacco firms fail in bid to have Malawi child labour case struck out, The Guardian, 25 June 2021, accessed January 2024
  112. STOP, Decades of Lies Show Tobacco Companies Can’t Be Trusted,, 14 March 2023, accessed June 2024
  113. L. Bauld, Impact of smokefree legislation: evidence review, Department of Health and Social Care, March 2011, accessed March 2021
  114. Tobacco Manufacturers’ Association, Three Years on – industry calls time on a complete smoking ban, 1 July 2010, TMA website, accessed March 2021
  115. Imperial Tobacco, The Bauld truth – The Impact of Smokefree Legislation in England: A critique of the evidence review using publicly available information, June 2011, accessed March 2021
  116. D. Petrie, Email to Lorenza Fernandez, 14 February 2011, accessed February 2011
  117. D. Petrie, Email to Lorenza Fernandez, 1 March 2011, accessed February 2011
  118. E. Grandolfo, H. Ogden, I.M. Fearon et al, Tobacco-Free Nicotine Pouches and Their Potential Contribution to Tobacco Harm Reduction: A Scoping Review, Cureus 16(2): e54228. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54228
  119. I.M. Fearon, R.G.N. Seltzer, T.L. Houser et al, Curiosity and intentions to use myblu e-cigarettes and an examination of the ‘gateway’ theory: Data from cross-sectional nationally representative surveys, Drug Testing and Analysis, 15, 10, (1257-1269), 2023, doi: 10.1002/dta.3450
  120. F. Chapman, E. Trelles Sticken, R. Wieczorek et al, Multiple endpoint in vitro toxicity assessment of a prototype heated tobacco product indicates substantially reduced effects compared to those of combustible cigarette, Toxicology in Vitro, Volume 86, February 2023, 105510, doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2022.105510
  121. Organised Crime and Corruption Reporting Project, British American Tobacco Fights Dirty in West Africa, 26 February 2021, accessed March 2021
  122. M. Milner, J. Hooper, Imperial boss held in German smuggling raid, The Guardian, 15 January 2003, accessed April 2024
  123. abR. Murray-West, K. Connolly, German police probe Imperial link with Iraq, The Daily Telegraph, 15 January 2003, accessed April 2024
  124. K. Evans-Reeves, A. Rowell, Tobacco industry rallies against illicit trade- but have we forgotten its complicity?, The Conversation, 16 March 2015, accessed March 2021
  125. Select Committee on Public Accounts, Minutes of Evidence Examination of Witnesses (Questions 540-559), 19 June 2002, accessed March 2021
  126. Unknown, International Trading – opportunities for Gallaher, undated, Truth Tobacco Industry Documents, Bates no: GA00025, accessed March 2021
  127. J.R. Branston, A.B. Gilmore, The failure of the UK to tax adequately tobacco company profits, J Public Health (Oxf). 2020 Feb 28;42(1):69-76, doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdz004
  128. Let it roll, Scottish Local Retailer, 1 March 2024, accessed April 2024
  129. J. Thomson, Up in smoke | In focus: Smoking and smoking alternatives, Talking Retail, 14 March 2024, accessed April 2024
  130. J.R. Branston, A. McNeill, A.B. Gilmore et al, Keeping smoking affordable in higher tax environments via smoking thinner roll-your-own cigarettes: Findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country Survey 2006–15, Drug and Alcohol Dependence 193 (2018) 110-116, doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.07.047
  131. J. Thomson, Imperial’s independent-exclusive 21s and 32g formats return, Talking Retail, 11 December 2023, accessed April 2024
  132. J. Hart, Imperial launches Players Max cigarettes, Better Retailing, 7 November 2023, accessed April 2024
  133. Imperial Brands, Imperial Brands Ventures Ltd announces investment in Oxford Cannabinoid Technologies, press release, 28 June 2018, accessed April 2024
  134. C. Muirhead, Board battle at Snoop Dogg cannabis firm: Tobacco giant Imperial wades in as founders clash over control, This is Money, 20 March 2022, accessed April 2024
  135. J. Warner, Vaping or cannabis: where’s the growth for Big Tobacco?, IG, 17 February 2020, accessed March 2024
  136. Imperial Brands, Imperial Brands Chief Executive Officer to Step Down, 3 October 2019, accessed October 2019
  137. Imperial Brands, Pre-close Trading Update, 26 September 2019, accessed October 2019
  138. Imperial Brands, Our leadership team, 2024, accessed April 2024
  139. Inchape plc, Our Leadership Team, Inchape website, 11 January 2018, accessed March 2021
  140. abcdefLobbyFacts, Imperial Brands PLC (IMB), undated, accessed March 2021, September 2023
  141. LobbyFacts, Fontem Ventures, undated, accessed September 2023
  142. AmCham Moldova, Members, archived December 2023, accessed April 2024
  143. The American Chamber of Commerce Ukraine, List of members, 2024, accessed April 2024
  144. The Anti-Counterfeiting Group, BRAND Members, archived November 2023, accessed April 2024
  145. Asia Pacific Travel Retail Association, Our Members, APTRA website, undated, accessed March 2021
  146. Association of Business Service Leaders, Members, archived November 2023, accessed April 2024
  147. abM. Davey, Pro-tobacco lobbyists circle Australian government’s proposed vaping reforms, The Guardian, 20 March 2023, accessed April 2024
  148. British Chamber of Commerce Czech Republic, Imperial Brands CR, s.r.o., archived October 2023, accessed April 2024
  149. Confederation of Industry of the Czech Republic, Imperial Brands CR, s.r.o., archived November 2023, accessed April 2024
  150. Itmac, About Us, archived March 2024, accessed April 2024
  151. Industry and Parliament Trust, Supporting organisations, Industry and Parliament Trust website, September 2017, accessed March 2021
  152. Institute of Business Ethics, Email reply to Tobacco Tactics editor 21 February 2017 10:00, subject: RE: Query about IBE membership Imperial Brands
  153. Imperial Brands, GRI and SASB Index 2023, accessed April 2024
  154. Society of European Affairs Professionals, Our Members, 2024, accessed April 2024
  155. LobbyFacts, Tobacco and Nicotine Products Chemicals Group (TNPC), accessed September 2023
  156. Vereniging Nederlandse Sigaretten, Homepage, archived 11 December 2023, accessed April 2024
  157. Public Relations and Communications Association, Public Affairs Board, UK Public Affairs Registers, PRCA website, accessed September 2023
  158. Association of Professional Political Consultants, APPC Registers, December 2016 – August 2018, accessed September 2023
  159. Association of Professional Political Consultants, APPC Previous Registers, APPC website, June 2013-May 2018, archived 29 October 2018, accessed September 2023
  160. Office of the Registrar of Consultant Lobbyists, Imperial Brands PLC, 2023, accessed April 2024
  161. UK Lobbying Register, David Alexander, January 2020, accessed March 2021